Jason Kenny is promoting the idea of school choice – code for the expansion of charter and private
schools. The UCP policy platform commits to equal funding for students, whether they attend public, Catholic, private or
charter schools. Alberta already has has
the highest per-capita funding of private schools in the country at 70 percent
of public school students, compared to 60 percent in Quebec, 50 percent in
B.C. and Manitoba and zero percent in
Ontario.
Yet the evidence is clear
that charter and private schools do not increase the overall performance of the
education system in a jurisdiction. The World Bank says so:
“There
is no consistent evidence that private schools
deliver better learning outcomes than public schools.
Numerous risks, such as the exclusion of disadvantaged
or less able or desirable students, social segregation,
exploitation of families for profit and the undermining of
public education.” –World Bank Development Report on Education, 2017
deliver better learning outcomes than public schools.
Numerous risks, such as the exclusion of disadvantaged
or less able or desirable students, social segregation,
exploitation of families for profit and the undermining of
public education.” –World Bank Development Report on Education, 2017
And the OECD also says so:
“School choice advocates often
argue that the
introduction of market mechanisms in education allows
equal access to high quality schooling for all…However
evidence does not support these perceptions, as choice
and associated market mechanisms can enhance
segregation.” –OECD Equity and Quality in Education – Supporting Disadvantaged Students and Schools, 2012
introduction of market mechanisms in education allows
equal access to high quality schooling for all…However
evidence does not support these perceptions, as choice
and associated market mechanisms can enhance
segregation.” –OECD Equity and Quality in Education – Supporting Disadvantaged Students and Schools, 2012
A 2019 study
of the charter schools in Ohio conducted by Stanford University shows that the
“typical charter school student in Ohio makes similar progress in reading and
weaker growth in math compared to the educational gains that the student would
have made in a traditional public school” and further shows “that enrollment in
online charter schools is associated with substantially negative learning gains
in both reading and math, which drags down the overall charter school impact on
student progress”. Similar
results were found in Idaho and slightly better results were
found for some Charter schools, but not all, in Washington State. Similar
findings are reported for academies (charter schools) in England.
But there are also significant examples of failure. A recent report
from the Network for Public Education in the US shows that some 40% of US
Government-funded charter schools either never opened or closed shortly after receiving
government funding, wasting
one-third of the $4.1 billion allocated by the Federal Government.
What private and charter schools do to a school system is to
change
the composition of public schools, reduce
overall available funding for public schools and put at risk the equity of
school systems. In a major study of the privatization
of public education, Sam Abrams demonstrates the negative impacts of the
explosion of charter schools in the US and other countries.
Sweden
is an interesting case. The country privatized much of its K-12 system
only to find that the private providers could
not function effectively and produce results. Some
went bankrupt. Much like any
corporate entity, they cut corners by employing cheaper teachers that were not qualified while spending lavishly on outside consultants. They also employed a competitive scheme where teachers were financially rewarded for garnering better test scores, leading the school to focus more on test preparation
than on education and learning.
In England, the transfer of
public resources to private firms continues apace. Charter schools (known as
academies or free schools in England) have supplanted schools which were
formerly public schools supervised by skilled educational oversight teams and
local education authorities. More than 7,000 schools have become academies. Academies don’t have to follow the national
curriculum and can set their own
term times. Funded directly by Government, the only oversight they receive is
from their own managing board and from a national inspection service. Many
academies are part of “chains” or network of like-minded schools bonded by
common ownership. Some of these chains have collapsed in scandal. There is no evidence that academies perform better than public
schools, once adjustments are made
for intake.
What is more, academies are
not efficient. In 2018 six of the 10 largest academy trusts issued warnings over pay, short-staffing, building
safety, and financial risks. The trusts cover hundreds of English schools. One
of the largest chains, the Ark Schools, posted a £4.1 million loss in 2017-18 even though it had over 50,000 students enrolled. A
recent report suggests that eight
out of ten academies are in deficit.
So why the interest in
charter schools? One answer is money. While the organizations that run them pay
themselves handsomely, secure significant assets (in England this includes land,
buildings, and infrastructure) that were previously publicly owned and can award
their own partner businesses lucrative consulting, technology and management
contracts. While the academy or charter school may not be financially viable, the State is always there to “bail” out schools at
risk of closure.
A second reason is
ideological. Charter schools can pursue their own versions of teaching and
learning somewhat independent of oversight by others. In Canada, Charter schools still have to offer the
Provincial curriculum and be subject to Provincial education regulations, but
have a degree of independence not found in many school districts. Alberta adopted charter schools in 1994 to
encourage innovation and permit parental choice. The thirteen charter schools that
remain (three closed due to poor registrations, poor management or some
combination of both) are largely located in Calgary and Southern Alberta.
Alberta also has a
significant number of private registered or accredited private schools which
serve app. 4% of Alberta’s school students. Most of these schools reflect a
commitment to a particular religion. The key difference between Charter and
Private schools relate to the ability to determine who can be admitted –
private schools can select students, Charter schools cannot. The Alberta
government provides app. $13,000 in funding for every child who
goes to public school but just $5,200 for everyone in a private school. The
funding for private school students amounts to app. $162 million per year out
of a $9-billion education budget.
Five other Provinces in Canada provide no funds to private schools, yet they
persist in these jurisdictions.
Albertan’s have a great deal
of choice between types of publicly funded schools. Alberta is one of only
three provinces that provide fully-funded Catholic education, and one of only
two provinces that provide fully-funded French Catholic education, within the
public system.
Would increasing the number
of private or charter schools and increasing the level of public funding
available improve the performance of the system overall? There is no compelling
evidence that it would.
No comments:
Post a Comment