In 2013 Janet Tully and I published Rethinking Post-Secondary Education - Why Universities and Colleges Need to Change and What Change Could Look Like. Its a provocative look at such institutions in the developed world. This blog continues that provocation.
The goal of
this blog is to stimulate an inspired conversation about the future of learning
in our post-secondary education system. I want to focus on three things:
- The importance of understanding
learning and the way students learn;
- The importance of access,
performance and engagement of students; and
- The challenges we face in
delivering affordable, mindful and effective post-secondary education
which is a great experience for all.
This is
really about how we create a new learning environment. As a sector, we are looking to do this
through “innovation” which automatically and logically means we need to be
ready to:
- Explore new insights;
- Take calculated risks;
- Be surprised and to surprise ourselves.
Innovation,
by its very nature, is an experiment with unknown outcomes.
So to help
us begin the process of creating a new learning environment, let us identify a
series of insights, surprises and risks we see based on my experience working
with students, colleagues throughout the Canada system and colleagues from around
the world.
One other
point: students you should not be seen as the recipients of learning or as the
“fodder” of the education system but should be seen as co-workers and co-owners
of the college, university and training system.
They are investors, partners,
allies and the co-creators of the institutions in which they learn.The one
overriding way for students to help transform our post-secondary system is for students
to be “demanding customers” of the system in five key areas:
- Accessibility
- Flexibility
- Transferability
- Recognition of credentials
- Affordability
In the
1960s, students campaigned for the right to be at the table and to be engaged
in decision-making. Now they need to
champion their right to help focus thinking and investment in the education
system we are building together.
Insights
- Significant
change in our institutions will come in response to developments from outside
rather than from innovation within them.
Post-secondary
institutions are built to withstand demands for significant change. They have done so well - one paper suggests
that the real challenge for educators is Massively Outdated Traditional
Education (MOTEs) rather than MOOCs[1].
Emerging new delivery models (MOOCs for
example) and new assessment centres offering new kinds of assessment will force
change on our institutions as will the growing use of globally-recognized and
transferable credits. Students will make
decisions and behave in accordance with the “what is best for me” principle and
these behaviours will demand change in the system. Post-secondary educational
institutions will likely follow these developments rather than lead – others
will be expected to take the “start-up” risk.
- The
best predictor of student success is student engagement – yet we don’t
make systematic attempts to measure this.
Student
engagement is not at all the same as indicators of student satisfaction which
are usually taken in simple surveys at the end of a course. Engagement speaks
to a set of behaviours and attitudes experienced throughout the course. Not
measuring it means it often goes unrecognized and unrewarded for students and
instructors both. Effective pedagogy
requires the student to be the focus of the work of the college or university –
academic staff is there to enable the student to learn. We need to shift from instructor-centric to
learner-centric forms of learning.
- Online
learning in 2015 is where online music was around 2005.
Many see
online learning as a maturing field – it is not. It is in its infancy and a lot of things are
yet to happen. A useful way of thinking
about this is to compare iTunes in 2005 with iTunes in 2015. Dramatically different. Key to this is understanding that, for most
students, online learning is not something different or unusual – it is simply
part of how learning is done. It’s the
digital tourists who see it as “new” and “different”. Since 2000, students have seen digital
resources, e-learning and the use of the net as a utility – a part of every one
of their courses – not as anything “special”.
- Canada’s
information technology sector is in decline.
It’s not
just Blackberry that is in trouble, the whole sector is. Many medium sized companies are selling out to
US based organizations or leaving the field. We already lost Nortel. What
are the implications of this for our use of technology and for the skills we
need for our competitive advantage as an economy? What are we not teaching our entrepreneurs? A great many of the emerging resources used
for learning are global resources. We
need to continuously scan the world for “next and best” practice so that our
students can experience effective, efficient and engaging learning.
- Many
have a 1950s view of the role of post-secondary education in terms of
preparing learners for the workforce.
In the 1950s,
students went to school aged 5-21 and then entered the workforce, with many entering
the workforce at 16. Now students enter
education at 2 (kindergarten) and many go through to 24 and return for learning
at 31, 40, 50-55 and 65. Yet we design
our system as if it hadn’t changed. With life-long learning now more than a
slogan – it is in fact a description of what is occurring – we need to begin rethinking
our understanding of our post-secondary institutions.
Lifelong
learning is no longer the slogan of a small group of continuing education
specialists – it is what the knowledge economy demands. Companies like the
Hudson’s Bay, Ford, Stantec, Air Canada all require their managerial and
operational staff to be continuously updating their knowledge and skills.
Learning is the key to their competitiveness.
- Faculty
are both the biggest asset and the biggest impediment to the future.
The key to
effective learning is the relationship between the student, knowledge and their
coach/guide/mentor, aka the faculty. But
faculty doesn’t especially want to change either what they are teaching or how
they are doing so. Adoption rates for
online / blended learning are below 30% of faculty even in institutions which
are most advanced in the use of technology for learning. Many of the subjects we now teach need
revision, especially, as I will note in my next point, as knowledge is changing
and expanding at a very fast rate. We
need to change what we teach, how we engage learners, how we connect learning
to the wicked problems we face in society and how we assess students. Those faculty who “get these” changes will
lead the future in partnership with students. Those who don’t get it will “get lost” as the
future overtakes them.
- No
researcher can maintain full knowledge of development in their discipline.
According
to figures supplied by James Appleberry, cited by José Joaquín Brunner cited by
UNESCO[2],
internationally recorded discipline-based knowledge took 1,750 years to double
for the first time, counting from the start of the Christian era; it then
doubled in volume every 150 years and then every 50. It now doubles every five years and it is
projected that by 2020 knowledge will double every 73 days. However, we are only capable of giving
attention to between about 5% and 10% of that information. Will this change the link between research and
teaching in the post-secondary system? What
will this mean for the challenge faced by learners in their attempt to master
an understanding of some key ideas?
- Sustainability
issues will dominate the world from now onwards. Water, air quality, climate
change, environmental impacts of our current forms of economy are all
becoming critical issues around the world.
What
contribution will our institutions make not just to the research on these
issues, but to action? How will our
institutions be role models for the future? Institutions are beginning to
develop courses and programs in which the “wicked problems” facing the world
are the focus for learning – subjects like biology, climatology, technology,
history, psychology and so on are all harnessed as resources so that students
can learn, engage in action research and develop applied skills based on sound
knowledge aimed at solving these problems at a local level. Do we need to re-think curriculum, the focus
for learning and pedagogy so that communities are enabled through their
post-secondary institutions to be better prepared for tomorrow?
- The
creative economy requires learning to be a creative process.
One measure
being considered in a number of jurisdictions for their K-12 systems is known as
the Innovation Index – several US states
and one Canadian jurisdiction are considering the introduction of this measure. It asks the simple question “on how many
occasions this week did our students have an opportunity to create and innovate
as part of their learning activities?” Our
answer would be…… yet we seek to prepare our students for a knowledge-based,
innovation-driven economy where creativity is key. What are we actually doing about it? Do we
assess institutions and their progress against systematic measures of
innovation, creativity and imagination? No. We should.
- Quality
assessment of institutions, programs and courses focuses largely on inputs.
Yet
students can now secure inputs from a range of resources. Shouldn’t we shift our quality focus to
outcomes and student engagement and creativity? As an aside here, most
educational research activity focuses on the past and the present – not on the
future. We may need to challenge our
research community to look systematically as the future using the tools of
futurism studies.
These ten
insights suggest that re-thinking what and how we learn is the key to
understanding the challenges and opportunities of our system. Rather than campaigning for “more of the
same”, we should all be campaigning for an engaged pedagogy that is based on a
better understanding of real-world problems and their solution and makes best
use of all available resources for learning. Technology can help us, but it is not the
answer: re-thinking pedagogy is.
SURPRISES
There will
be many surprises in the medium to long-term future. Here are ten.
- Demand
for post-secondary education changes in response to the stability and
growth of the economy.
As the
economy contracts, so demand rises unless
the contraction is seen as more permanent. When this occurs, demand falls. This is exactly what is happening in Europe
right now - 50,000 fewer university applicants in the UK in 2012 than in 2011- and
if the global economy suffers in 2015 as most analysts suspect it will, then
demand for post-secondary education in Canada will fall dramatically. Companies are reluctant to recruit when the
economy remains volatile –the lack of resolution of the Eurozone crisis,
falling oil prices, economic uncertainty in the US, a slowing of Canada’s
economy and the challenging situation in the Middle East all suggest a
continuing period of economic vulnerability.
Individuals work when they can – learning comes second.
Yet
learning still needs to occur. We need to imagine new ways of connecting
work-based learning with credit and sustaining an interest in learning for
those in work.
- It
is likely that some Canadian colleges and/or universities will file for
bankruptcy before 2020.
Several are
already running significant deficits and are reliant on substantial growth in
overseas students as well as very moderate faculty settlements for survival. Both of these look problematic. BC cut $70 million from its post-secondary
education budget in 2012 and Alberta first constrained growth of its spending
to 2% and will now start to make significant budget cuts. If enrolment falls, then many more
institutions will find their fiscal situation beyond repair. We may need to re-think funding at a
fundamental level, but one solution needs to be “off the table”. We can’t repair
the fiscal health of our post-secondary education system by transferring debt
to the student body. We just need to
look to Québec to see what could happen. A serious, adult conversation about how we re-think
the finances of the sector is needed.
- The
fastest area of growth in demand will be for online learning not for
traditional classroom-based learning.
This is
already occurring in the US which is experiencing 10% growth in online versus
1% for traditional. It will happen here
too. It will accelerate if online
learning becomes available on-demand, with students calling for assessment when
they are ready. It will accelerate when
digital devices – tablets, smartphones and other mobile learning devices become
more affordable. It will accelerate even faster when the quality of online
learning improves.
- Strong
demand for access to post-secondary education will come from retired baby
boomers seeking to learn “what they always wanted to know”.
Many years
ago there was a lot written about The
University of the Third Age. Well it is happening. A significant driver for many uses of open
educational course materials, OER, is demand from baby boomers. This is the wealthiest generation of retirees
in history and they are using their retirement wealth to travel, learn and be
engaged in projects to help communities. How can we harness their knowledge and skills
as mentors, coaches and guides and see them as more than “just another target
group of potential students”. How can we
enable the inter-generational transfer of knowledge?
Continuing
education is often one of the most dynamic and creative areas of institutions,
showing that it is possible when released from some of the constraints of
academe.
- New
knowledge areas will demand a place in the curriculum. Knowledge is
changing quickly both in volume, complexity and in synergy. New areas of knowledge are rapidly
emerging.
Synthetic
biology matched with engineering and ecology is one example - real work in the
oil sands in “solving” the tailings ponds problem requires these synergies. We will need to change what we teach more
often than we have done in the past. Nimble
curriculum will be a mantra for the future.
- Global
credentials will emerge in 2015.
As collaborative
arrangements amongst institutions expand, enabling students to take courses
from a variety of them so as to “construct their credential”, a form of
personalized learning, then global credentials will emerge. For example, where will a student who studies
courses from the Princeton, Stanford, University of Edinburgh in Scotland, the
University of Toronto and EPF Lausanne, a technical university in Switzerland, be
awarded a degree in computing science from? All of these or just one?
- The
World Trade Organization will succeed, eventually, in its desire to have
education seen as a service sector and be subject to WTO trade rules.
Since 2000,
the WTO has been engaged in a conversation that would see educational services
such as courses, programs, etc. as a service sector subject to the General
Agreement on Trade and Tariffs . The WTO
is confident that, at some point, education will be a “settled service”. This would open the global market to direct
competition and see many of the quality assurance mechanisms now in place as
discriminatory and anti-free trade practices. Real competition (on price, on quality, on
pedagogy) would arrive. When it does, it
will be a new game in town. Canada has
resisted this development, but the momentum for a resolution in favour of the
WTO is growing.
- Companies
will seek credential arrangements with institutions on a large scale.
As
demography challenges firms to secure a workforce with the skills they need for
their competitive advantage, they will look to retain staff through support for
learning and will demand work-based learning credits, more in house programs
and more “purpose built” credentials. Someone
will provide these.
- Despite
predictions, demand will shift from highly qualified people to trades and
skills-based work.
Our economy
is changing. Ontario, for example, is a
service economy rather than a primary manufacturing economy. Will the mix of employment shift to favour
more and more skilled service employees and trades? It is elsewhere.
These
surprises suggest that the future will not be a straight line from the past.
Several of these surprises are forms of disruption to the status quo. One option for Ontario is to lead the
disruption rather than wait to be a victim of it. That is the option we should pursue.
RISKS
When anyone
looks in any kind of systematic way at the future, they see risk. So here are ten risks that I see to the
emerging global economy for learning:
- In
the face of challenge, threat or change, our institutions will seek to
constrain innovation from new entrants and third parties.
The
adoption of restrictive practices, market protection and related measures will
be in response to perceived threats from private sector players, global players
and new entrants from the public sector in other jurisdictions. The risk here is that in seeking to protect
existing practices, the opportunities for real change and collaboration across
borders and institutional boundaries will be lost. This would be a short-sighted response. We
should learn from competition and thrive on the opportunity the competition
provides to improve, change and develop new forms of institution, new pedagogy
and new programs.
- Leaders
who try to change their institutions will be left out in the cold by their
own institutions.
We have
seen this in prestigious institutions like Oxford and elsewhere in the world. In fact, it is becoming increasingly difficult
to recruit talented people to leadership roles from Deans upwards in colleges and
universities. At the heart of the
challenge for our future is the need for courageous, visionary leadership. We need to enable more courageous leaders,
including from the student body, if our system is to thrive rather than just
survive. Courage, vision and commitment
will be key. We need renaissance
leadership for our colleges and universities.
- Faculty
members will become highly mobile.
For years,
colleges and universities have been warning of the coming implications of the
grey tsunami. It is now beginning to
occur. Faculty members who are skilled
and highly effective teachers and researchers will be in high demand and will
trade their skills for pay and time and move more frequently.
- Universities
and colleges will lag so far behind the emerging technologies for learning
that students will vote with their feet and study with those institutions
elsewhere in the world who “get with the technology”.
Many
institutions appear “unsure” of their strategy with respect to learning,
technology and assessment and in turn lag behind in their adoption of emerging
technologies. As technologies become
cheaper and more powerful (Moore’s law) and more ubiquitous, then this issue
will become a determining factor in student choice. This will be enabled by transfer credit and
prior learning assessment, especially if the “residency” requirement, usually
that 50% of credits for a program awarded by an institution must be taken at
that institution, changes. Imagine a
program that has no residency requirements where credits can be obtained from
anywhere in the world. You are thinking of new institutions, such as CourseA,
which are operating now.
- Maintaining
government funding through the Carnegie unit, payment for X hours of study
in a course, will inhibit innovation.
A major
system constraint is the way in which institutions are funded. If the current model persists, then
institutions will continue to offer the kind of programs and choices they offer
now. To secure innovation, new funding models are required. Without these, the
system may well atrophy. Those
institutions which have shifted to outcome-based funding are seeing more
innovation and higher levels of student registration such as the state of Kentucky
with its on demand program.
- Linear
learning paths are not how students will learn in the 21st
Century.
Increasingly,
students will stop and start, drop in and out of their learning. For them,
learning is a personal journey and a life-long one. But institutions still think of cohorts,
program completions and time to complete. By thinking of personalized learning pathways
as the route by which students learn, institutions will change what they do. The risk is that many institutions will make
this more difficult than it needs to be.
- Institutions
will price themselves out of some communities and some target groups.
Costs are
increasing from a student perspective – the costs of post-secondary education
constitute a sign cant portion of Canadian household debt. At some point, we need to recognize the impact
of this on a variety of groups and re-think student support and financial aid.
- First
Nations students will feel increasingly marginalized in expensive systems
which focus on forms of learning which are a-cultural and do not speak to
their concerns.
First Nations
students are a fast growing cohort, yet their success in the post-secondary
system is weak. Many of the directions
in which the system is going are counter to their preferred way of learning and
many new programs are “alien” to their understanding of need. We need to build new bridges and adaptive
institutions to meet their needs.
- The
link between post-secondary education and the needs of the fast changing
labour market will become more and more disconnected.
We are
preparing students in school, college and university for a world that is fast
changing and for jobs and roles which are just emerging and are ill defined. We do so increasingly by competency / skills-based
learning. Yet what we really need is
life-long learners who have core skills and adaptive abilities who are
intrapreneurs, entrepreneurs and resilient. Do we have the right forms of learning to
enable this to occur?
Be
the Owners!
We have
made twenty-nine provocative points. You
are probably experiencing a mixture of excitement, fear, anger and annoyance with
these points right now. But pause and
think of these three things:
- The
future isn’t what it used to be.
The game is
changing. We need to collaborate and
partner with all who have an interest in the system to re-think the system as a
continuous process. There are no magic bullets to “fix the system” and we have
to learn our way to the next iteration of a great post-secondary system. Through partnership, collaboration and
dialogue we can do great things. Indeed,
“collaboration is the DNA of the new knowledge economy”.
- Pedagogy
What we
learn, how we learn, how we engage learners and how we assess learning are the
core challenges. While finances,
governance, quality, access are important, it is pedagogy that is the driver. Pedagogy is changing. Are we changing pedagogy in appropriate,
effective and meaningful ways?
- Students
as the owners
We noted at
the outset, as students you need to “own” your education system and
institutions. By own here, we mean that you
are more than a “customer” of the system. You are critical co-owners and co-workers in
the system. You have knowledge, skill
and understanding and have experiences which can be key to understanding what
we need to do to ensure that Canada continues to have one of the best systems
in the world. Engagement in decision-making
is as important as engagement in the classroom.
No comments:
Post a Comment