On earth day, we are supposed to think that the planet is in
peril and that somehow humans are the cause of this peril. This is not the
case. The human impact on global climate is small, and any warming that may
occur as a result of human carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gas
emissions is likely to have little effect on global temperatures, the cryosphere
(ice-covered areas), hydrosphere (oceans, lakes, and rivers), or weather. This
is according to hundreds of peer reviewed studies examined by the Non
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in a March 2014 study (see here). Indeed, atmospheric C02 from all
sources (human contribution to the CO2 in the atmosphere is small) is showing
beneficial effects.
As Lomborg notes, the biggest threat to the environment is air
pollution – using dung and twigs to heat, light and cook. Close to three
billion people do this every day. This leads to strokes, heart disease and
cancer, and disproportionately affects women and children. The World Health
Organization estimates that it killed 4.3 million people in 2012. Add the
smaller death count from outdoor pollution, and air pollution causes one in
eight deaths worldwide.
In the rich world, most other environmental indicators have
improved dramatically. All developed countries have slashed their outdoor air
pollution and handled much of their water pollution, while even strongly
regulating small risks like pesticides and other chemical fears. In the
developed world, rivers just don’t catch fire as the Cuyahoga River did just
before the first Earth Day.
In the developing world, the overall environment has also
gotten better because of the dramatic drop in indoor air pollution. Outdoor air
pollution has risen — but this only confirms a long-standing finding that some
environmental indicators tend to first get worse, then better, with economic
development.
By focusing on global climate change, we miss opportunities
to do something practical and useful about air pollution. By focusing on CO2 we
miss the point completely – that the real issue is raising people out of
poverty, so that they use fuels and cooking materials which are less likely to
pollute the air and more likely to promote health.
By focusing on predictions of doom – the most recent IPCC
report suggests yet another tipping point (calling Woolf just once too often) –
rather on practical actions that can be taken to switch to natural gas, enable
fracking to bring on more low cost gas and help larger numbers rise from
poverty, Earth Day becomes a rant for the liberal elite to berate us all.
2 comments:
Thanks for the link to the NIPCC publicity undermining the IPCC's UN-based publicity. I have subscribed to the NIPCC's weekly PR feed to examine their evidence against anthropogenic impacts on climate. I will bear in mind that that the Heartland Institute, backed by conservative foundations on behalf of corporate interests, publishes their reports.
Thanks for the link to the NIPCC to which I have now subscribed in order to assess its denial of UN-sponsored IPCC conclusions. I will bear in mind that its publisher, the Heartland Institute, is funded by conservative corporate interests.
Post a Comment